科研速览继续刷下去 →
◆ Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026-01-01

Concurrent validity of a dual three-dimensional portable force-plate system against a laboratory force platform across vertical, anteroposterior and mediolateral loading tasks.

Vassilios Panoutsakopoulos, Panagiotis Kitsikoudis, Anestis Damianou, Malvina Tziouref, Stylianos Grigoriadis

一句话结论

Agreement for the primary force component of each task was excellent (CMJ: peak vertical force, ICC = 0.999; forward jump: peak AP force, ICC = 0.994; lateral jump: peak ML force, ICC = 0.999; each with a mean bias below 2.5% of the criterion). CoP excursion outcomes (AP range, ML range, and 95% confidence ellipse area) showed good-to-excellent agreement (ICC = 0.966-0.998). Secondary low-amplitude off-axis force components showed larger relative error.

原始摘要(原文)
INTRODUCTION: Portable three-dimensional (3D) force-plates are increasingly used for field measurements of sport performance. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the concurrent validity of a dual portable 3D force-plate system (KINVENT 3D-Deltas) against a single laboratory force-plate (AMTI) for the vertical, anteroposterior (AP), and mediolateral (ML) force components and for center-of-pressure (CoP) outcomes. METHODS: Ten physically active participants performed four tasks, each loading a specific axis: a countermovement jump (CMJ; vertical), a forward jump (AP), and a lateral jump (ML). Additionally, a quiet-stance trial was performed to validate CoP kinematics. The AMTI force-plate was mounted on top of the 3D-Deltas so that both systems recorded each trial simultaneously. Agreement was quantified with mean bias and 95% limits of agreement, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC; two-way random effects, absolute agreement, single measures), Pearson correlation, ordinary-least-squares regression, the root-mean-square error and paired-samples t-tests. RESULTS: Agreement for the primary force component of each task was excellent (CMJ: peak vertical force, ICC = 0.999; forward jump: peak AP force, ICC = 0.994; lateral jump: peak ML force, ICC = 0.999; each with a mean bias below 2.5% of the criterion). CoP excursion outcomes (AP range, ML range, and 95% confidence ellipse area) showed good-to-excellent agreement (ICC = 0.966-0.998). Secondary low-amplitude off-axis force components showed larger relative error. DISCUSSION: The KINVENT 3D-Deltas system is a valid surrogate for a laboratory force-plate when measuring the principal force component of each task and the principal CoP excursion outcomes, supporting its use for field performance assessments.
读原文 ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文

Concurrent validity of a dual three-dimensional portable force-plate system against a laboratory force platform across vertical, anteroposterior and mediolateral loading tasks. — 科研速览 Science Skim