M. Oosthoek, A. Leistra, Y. S. Hok-A-Hin, M. W. T. Tanck, T. Okuda, L. in 't Veld, A. Aladdin, P. van Bokhoven, B. Tijms, R. J. Jutten, P. Scheltens, E. G. B. Vijverberg, C. E. Teunissen, L. Vermunt
Background Fluid biomarkers enable the demonstration of the biological effects of novel therapies in Alzheimers disease (AD). However, longitudinal biomarker data are sparse and sample size calculations for fluid biomarkers are often lacking. Here, we provided longitudinal CSF and plasma AD biomarkers measured in samples collected in a placebo arm in a 1.5-year phase 2b trial, allowing us to study natural trajectories, required sample sizes and heterogeneity in early AD clinical trials. Methods We studied individuals from the placebo group (MCI due to AD (n=65) and AD dementia (n=41)) of the T-817MA trial (NCT04191486) with positive CSF AD biomarkers (mean age=69(7) years, Female=63%). Longitudinal biomarker changes in CSF (A{beta}42, A{beta}40, A{beta}42/40, pTau181, pTau217, NFL, tTau, YKL40, NRGN, ABL1, CHIT1, CLEC5A, ITGB2, MMP10, SDC4, SPON2, THBD) and plasma biomarkers (A{beta}42, A{beta}40, A{beta}42/40, pTau181, pTau217, NFL, GFAP) were analyzed with linear mixed-effect models. Required sample size estimates for predefined treatment effects were generated. Lastly, we investigated the influence of between person variability in biomarker change by simulating a randomized clinical trial (1:1) 10000 times, and assessed the group differences at 1.5 years. Findings Fourteen biomarkers changed over time, with the largest annual changes observed for plasma pTau217 (+9.8%), CSF MMP10 (+7.1%), and CSF NFL (+6.9%), and CSF A{beta}40 by (-4.0%), CSF pTau217 (-3.0%), and CSF NRGN (-2.5%). To show a 30% change, similar to biomarker effects of approved AD drugs, almost all markers required less than 45 patients per trial arm. To reach normalized levels, established CSF markers required lower sample sizes than plasma markers. The effects of heterogeneity over time were approximately twice as large in plasma compared to CSF. Interpretation These findings offer insights into the biomarker trajectories and power in early AD, supporting more informed endpoint selection and forming a frame of reference for the interpretation of treatment effects in clinical trials.