科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Journal of Intelligent Decision Making and Information Science2026-07-31· Structural equation modeling

Developing SDG-Based Indicators for 21st-Century Physical Education Program Evaluation

Sobsun Mahaniyom

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
The transformation of education under the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) requires innovative approaches to evaluating educational programs beyond traditional academic outcomes. Physical Education (PE) plays a crucial role in promoting physical literacy, lifelong learning, health, well-being, inclusion, and sustainability. However, existing PE evaluation frameworks often fail to align with Sustainable Development Goal 4 (SDG 4) and the competencies required in the twenty-first century. This study aimed to develop and validate a comprehensive SDG-based indicator framework for evaluating 21st-century Physical Education programs in higher education. A mixed-methods sequential exploratory design was employed. Phase I involved a systematic literature review of SDG 4 indicators, UNESCO Quality Physical Education guidelines, physical literacy frameworks, and 21st-century skills literature. Phase II utilized a three-round Delphi process with 25 experts in physical education, educational evaluation, sustainability education, and curriculum development. Phase III validated the proposed indicators through a survey of 420 physical education teachers and university lecturers. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) were applied to assess construct validity and model fit. Findings: The study identified five dimensions comprising 25 indicators: (1) Physical Literacy Development, (2) Sustainable Learning Competencies, (3) Health and Well-Being Outcomes, (4) Inclusion and Equity, and (5) Global Citizenship and Sustainability Awareness. The measurement model demonstrated satisfactory validity and reliability (χ²/df = 1.96, CFI = 0.97, TLI = 0.96, RMSEA = 0.047, SRMR = 0.041). All factor loadings exceeded 0.70 and composite reliability values ranged from 0.88 to 0.95.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Developing SDG-Based Indicators for 21st-Century Physical Education Program Evaluation — 科研速览 Science Skim