Ramil Akhundov, Elshan Hashimov, Islam Islamov
Physical protection systems are often justified through prescriptive controls and compliance checklists, yet such evidence does not necessarily demonstrate operational sufficiency under adaptive, scenario-dependent threats. This paper proposes a scenario-oriented framework that provides a traceable path from threat classes to verifiable design requirements by formalizing sufficiency as explicit constraints on the integrated detection–delay–response chain. A bounded scenario library is defined, each scenario is mapped to adversary and defender timelines, and sufficiency is expressed through a time-margin condition with optional chance constraints to capture uncertainty. Derivation rules convert threat-class assumptions into requirement templates stated as bounds on detection, validation, decision, delay, and response components, coupled with predefined acceptance evidence. The results yield a reproducible sufficiency specification, a scenario matrix that documents coverage and dominant failure modes, and an auditable requirement structure that supports differentiated requirements for covert, forced-entry, insider-assisted, and coordinated scenarios. The framework strengthens review defensibility by enforcing traceability from each requirement to scenario constraints and enabling lifecycle revalidation as facility conditions and threat behaviors evolve.