Biting Down on Longevity: Correlating Microhardness, Nanoroughness, and Wear Resistance of Milled vs. 3D-Printed Dental Polymers.

The nanoscale surface topography and microhardness of additive and subtractive dental polymers were evaluated following exposure to environmental challenges. The study examined two 3D-printed resins (Saremco and Voco) and two milled CAD/CAM blocks (Vita Enamic and Tetric). Specimens were allocated to control or experimental groups and subjected to hydrothermal ageing (thermocycling), in vitro mechanical wear, or a combined protocol involving wear followed by thermal ageing. Surface microtopography was analysed both quantitatively and qualitatively using atomic force microscopy (AFM), while structural stability was assessed through surface microhardness testing. Statistical significance was determined using matrix comparisons (p < 0.05). Milled monolithic blocks demonstrated a dense, uniform baseline topography, whereas 3D-printed resins exhibited structural heterogeneity attributed to their layer-by-layer photocuring process. Saremco maintained polymer network stability under thermal stress (p = 0.1878), while Voco was highly susceptible to hydrothermal swelling and early matrix plasticization (p = 0.0084). The combined protocol of wear and thermal ageing resulted in advanced structural breakdown in all groups (p < 0.001). Industrial subtractive blocks exhibited greater resistance to oral environmental stresses. The ceramic framework of Vita Enamic limited polymer domain collapse, whereas Tetric experienced accelerated inter-layer delamination and embrittlement. The combined protocol of wear followed by thermal ageing resulted in significant and uniform degradation of surface microhardness and topographic roughness in all tested groups. Nevertheless, the additively manufactured resins demonstrated substantial structural integrity and exhibited low volumetric wear rates.