Patrice Salzenstein, Thomas Y. Wu, Ekaterina Pavlyuchenko
International comparisons play a critical role in ensuring precision, accuracy, consistency, and trust in the global metrology system. The Comité International des Poids et Mesures (CIPM) established the Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA) in 1999 to facilitate global trade. This paper gives an overview of the critical role of international comparisons to National Metrology Institutes (NMIs), industrial calibration laboratories, and research laboratories in fostering global measurement equivalence and the CIPM MRA. NMIs rely on Key and Supplementary Comparisons to ensure the mutual recognition of calibration and reference material certificates, vital for global trade and regulatory compliance. Industrial calibration laboratories participate in inter-laboratory or international comparisons to validate their calibration and measurement capability (CMC) and balance their risk management. Research laboratories push the frontiers of measurement science and validate their measurement result via international comparisons. Through some examples of comparisons, the paper illustrates how measurement result discrepancies uncovered in comparisons drive technical improvements, uncertainty component identification, and measurement technique refinement. International comparisons enhance scientific credibility, build public trust, support industrial innovation, and drive evolution in measurement science. As technological demands grow, fostering broader participation in international comparisons by various metrology and research laboratories remains crucial to maintain a robust and reliable global metrology system.