Mostafa Moallim, Seokhee Lee, Ibrahim Alzahrani, Faisal Abdulaziz Alfouzan, Kyounggon Kim
Ransomware operations have evolved from isolated malware incidents into organized ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) ecosystems that employ coordinated tactics, techniques, and procedures and increasingly rely on automation and artificial intelligence to scale intrusions. However, most assessments remain artifact-centric, focusing on malware signatures or aggregate victim counts, which provide limited visibility into differences in actor-level behavior and operational capability. This study introduces the AI-Amplification Indicator (AIAI), an interpretable actor-level scoring framework that transforms publicly observable leak-site disclosures and verifiable open-source evidence into quantitative behavioral profiles. Using continuous monitoring of dark web leak portals, we construct a standardized dataset of ransomware disclosures for 2025 with temporal, geographic, and sector metadata. AIAI measures four complementary dimensions: GenAI-enabled social engineering, operational tempo and orchestration, targeting breadth and diversification, and temporal scaling dynamics. Indicators are computed for all observed actors, while comparative profiling focuses on the ten most active actors to ensure stable behavioral estimation. The analysis reveals substantial heterogeneity in posting cadence, targeting strategies, and scaling dynamics, as well as limited but measurable evidence of automated or AI-assisted deception. These differences are not captured by victim counts alone. The proposed framework provides a transparent and reproducible approach for actor-level ransomware intelligence, enabling systematic comparison of operational styles and supporting data-driven defensive prioritization.