科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Scientific reports2026-07-25

Default-threshold operating-point validation of a commercial chest radiograph AI system for selected CT-anchored thoracic findings: a bi-national multicenter retrospective study.

Yeliz Basar, Mustafa Ege Seker, Galina Ivanova Kirova-Nedyalkova, Elina Plamenova Milkovska, Boyan Emilov Manov, Atahan Tamturk, Ilke Tasci, Melih Karadag, Nuri Sarac, Selin Ardali Duzgun, Erencan Karakoc, Ahmet Karabulut, Cemre Kavi, Kaan Buyukkirli, Mehmet Onur Onal, Deniz Alis, Recep Savas, Ercan Karaarslan, Gamze Durhan

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
This retrospective bi-national multicenter diagnostic accuracy study evaluated the locked default-threshold performance of a commercial chest radiograph AI system for selected thoracic findings using a CT-anchored, radiographic-detectability reference framework. Consecutive eligible adult patients who underwent frontal chest radiography and chest CT at four tertiary-care centers in Turkey and Bulgaria between June and December 2024 were included. Reference labels were assigned using temporally paired CT, with adjudication of whether CT-confirmed abnormalities had a corresponding radiographic manifestation on the paired chest radiograph. For potentially dynamic findings, the allowable CT-CXR interval was restricted to ≤ 2 days. The AI system was evaluated at the manufacturer's default threshold of 0.50. Diagnostic performance was summarized using prevalence, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and false-positive burden with 95% confidence intervals. The study included 940 patients with paired CXR-CT examinations. Reference-positive prevalence ranged from 2.2% for pneumothorax to 21.0% for pleural effusion. Sensitivity was highest for fracture (91%) and pneumothorax (90%) and lowest for atelectasis (64%); specificity ranged from 82% for consolidation/opacity to 98% for fracture and pneumothorax. PPV ranged from 43% to 63%, indicating a non-trivial false-positive burden at the evaluated operating point. Because continuous probability scores, human-reader comparison, and workflow outcomes were unavailable, these findings should be interpreted as default-threshold technical validation and support further evaluation of the system as radiologist-supervised decision support with local performance monitoring, rather than standalone diagnosis.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Default-threshold operating-point validation of a commercial chest radiograph AI system for selected CT-anchored thoracic findings: a bi-national multicenter retrospective study. — 科研速览 Science Skim