科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Frontiers in pharmacology2026-01-01

Efficacy and safety of resina draconis as an adjuvant therapy for diabetic foot ulcer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Shiwei Zhou, Yi Guan, Qiping Yu, Jiaxin Li, Lan Ma, Chengliang Zhu

一句话结论 · In one sentence

Resina Draconis may be an effective and safe adjunctive therapy for DFUs, potentially enhancing wound healing and reducing systemic inflammation. However, the findings should be interpreted cautiously because of the limited sample sizes and potential publication bias of the included studies. Further large-scale, rigorously designed RCTs are needed to confirm these results.

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
BACKGROUND: Resina Draconis, a traditional Chinese herbal medicine with wound-healing properties, has been increasingly used as an adjunctive treatment for diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Resina Draconis in the treatment of DFUs. METHODS: Five electronic databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to December 2025. Eligible studies compared Resina Draconis combined with conventional therapy versus conventional therapy alone in patients with DFUs. Dichotomous outcomes were expressed as risk ratios (RRs), and continuous outcomes as mean differences (MDs), both with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Fourteen RCTs involving 1,011 participants were included. The meta-analysis showed that adjunctive treatment with Resina Draconis significantly improved the overall healing response (RR = 0.28; 95% CI, 0.20-0.39; P < 0.00001), shortened wound-healing time (MD = -11.66; 95% CI, -21.62 to -1.69; P = 0.02), and reduced serum C-reactive protein levels (MD = -1.99; 95% CI, -2.99 to -0.99; P < 0.0001). No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Resina Draconis may be an effective and safe adjunctive therapy for DFUs, potentially enhancing wound healing and reducing systemic inflammation. However, the findings should be interpreted cautiously because of the limited sample sizes and potential publication bias of the included studies. Further large-scale, rigorously designed RCTs are needed to confirm these results. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Identifier CRD42020189060.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Efficacy and safety of resina draconis as an adjuvant therapy for diabetic foot ulcer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. — 科研速览 Science Skim