Yun Lu, Haisu Xu, Yang Zhang, Jun Wei, Fangyuan Chen
In this cohort, the strategy of clamping the left subclavian artery during hemiarch replacement was associated with prolonged critical intraoperative times and a significantly increased risk of perioperative cerebral infarction. LSA occlusion was identified as an independent risk factor for stroke. These findings suggest that omitting LSA manipulation may be a safer and more efficient approach, but the results require validation in larger, prospective studies.
BACKGROUND: Acute type A aortic dissection is a catastrophic cardiovascular emergency requiring urgent surgery. Hemiarch replacement under deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) is a standard approach. This study compared the outcomes of two supra-aortic vessel management strategies during DHCA.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 109 patients undergoing hemiarch replacement between May 2024 and January 2026. Patients were divided into two groups: the left subclavian artery (LSA) Occlusion Group (n = 53), in which all three arch vessels (innominate, left common carotid, and left subclavian arteries) were dissected and clamped, and the LSA Non-Occlusion Group (n = 56), in which the LSA was left untouched. Continuous and categorical variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-square/Fisher's exact test, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify independent risk factors for perioperative cerebral infarction.
RESULTS: Preoperative baseline characteristics were well-balanced between groups (all p > 0.05). The LSA Occlusion Group had significantly longer total surgical duration (320 vs. 273 min, p < 0.001), aortic cross-clamp time (126 vs. 104.5 min, p = 0.016), and DHCA time (26 vs. 22 min, p < 0.001). The incidence of perioperative cerebral infarction was significantly higher in the LSA Occlusion Group (22.64% vs. 7.14%, p = 0.044). Multivariable analysis confirmed that LSA occlusion was an independent risk factor for cerebral infarction (OR=4.36, 95% CI 1.24-15.30, p = 0.020). The 30-day mortality rate was numerically higher in the LSA Occlusion Group (20.75% vs. 10.71%) but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.238). No significant differences were found in other major complications or recovery metrics.
CONCLUSION: In this cohort, the strategy of clamping the left subclavian artery during hemiarch replacement was associated with prolonged critical intraoperative times and a significantly increased risk of perioperative cerebral infarction. LSA occlusion was identified as an independent risk factor for stroke. These findings suggest that omitting LSA manipulation may be a safer and more efficient approach, but the results require validation in larger, prospective studies.