科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Indian journal of medical ethics2026-01-01

Responsible researchers and reviewers: Ethics of Good Clinical Practice silver jubilee workshop report.

D Savitha, Mathangi Krishnakumar, Prem Pais, Jagdish Chinnappa, Johnson Pradeep, Jyothi Idiculla, Manjulika Vaz, C K Nisha, Kavitha Rajarathna, Nancy Angeline, Mary Joseph, Jayanthi Savio, Karuna Ramesh Kumar

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
Ethics education in biomedical research in India is frequently limited to regulatory compliance, with inadequate emphasis on ethical reasoning, contextual vulnerability, and deliberative review processes. As part of the Silver Jubilee of the Institutional Ethics Committee of St John's Medical College Hospital, a one-day preconference workshop titled "Responsible Researchers and Reviewers: Ethics of Good Clinical Practice" was conducted during the 13th International Conference of Ethics Education. The workshop employed case-based, interdisciplinary discussions focusing on vulnerability, ethics committee accreditation, and ethical review of diverse study designs. Key gaps identified included difficulties in operationalising vulnerability, managing surrogate consent in critical care research, inconsistent ethics committee monitoring practices, and limited faculty preparedness for ethics pedagogy. The discussions revealed a need to move beyond knowledge transmission towards reflective, skills-based ethics education.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Responsible researchers and reviewers: Ethics of Good Clinical Practice silver jubilee workshop report. — 科研速览 Science Skim