科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
2026-07-31· Normalization (sociology)

The Shared Sin

Alex Golbin

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
As the current crisis spirals, a flashback to 2029 reveals the decision that haunts the present. During a high-stakes expansion of 70&M’s global supply-chain platform, Mitch identifies a low-probability weakness that, if triggered, would be system-level. Launch timelines are locked, competitors are circling, and the commercial upside is enormous. No one falsifies the risk; they massage the language until “critical” sounds manageable. The risk register bends to match the business plan. The chapter becomes a psychological autopsy of the normalization of deviance—how smart, well-intentioned leaders under pressure converge on the same self-serving story. As new evidence surfaces, the team suspects that someone has been patiently studying and exploiting those blind spots. Cornered, they consider a forbidden option: handing partial control to an automated “guardian” that might save the system—or lock them out. Failure is reframed not as a single villain’s error but as a quiet, collective drift that turns one compromised decision into the seed of a catastrophe that someone else is now willing to harvest.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

The Shared Sin — 科研速览 Science Skim