Elizabeth Jordan, Phoenix Grover, Patricia Parker, Jason Cowan, Babken Asatryan, Tomohiko Ai, Akos Berthold, Lucas Bronicki, Emily Brown, Rudy Celeghin, Matthew Edwards, Judith Fan, Cynthia A James, Renee Johnson, Daniel P Judge, Sean Jurgens, Najim Lahrouchi, Tom Lumbers, Francesco Mazzarotto, Argelia Medeiros Domingo, Brittney Murray, Stacey Peters, Kalliopi Pilichou, Alexandros Protonotarios, Karin van Spaendonck-Zwarts, Petros Syrris, Jessica Wang, Roddy Walsh, James S Ware, Ray E Hershberger
With substantial new evidence, the genetic architecture of DCM has rapidly expanded. This updated assessment of genes reported in DCM yielded 35 high-evidence curations, an increase from 19 only 5 years ago. The results of this evidence-based evaluation process inform clinical interpretation of genetic information in the care of DCM patients and families.
BACKGROUND: Evidence of the diverse genetic architecture of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) continues to emerge and requires reassessment of the clinical relevance of implicated disease genes. Building on the 2019-2020 Clinical Genome Resource evaluation, the DCM gene curation expert panel reconvened in 2024-2025 to conduct a reassessment of genes in DCM.
METHODS: The Clinical Genome Resource semiquantitative clinical validity classification framework was applied with specifications to DCM to classify genes into categories on the basis of strength of published evidence for a DCM phenotype. Previously curated genes were reassessed, and newly reported gene-disease-mode of inheritance (MOI) relationships, termed "curations," were evaluated.
RESULTS: Sixty-eight genes were evaluated, inclusive of 72 unique gene-disease-MOI relationships across 51 previously evaluated and 17 newly assessed genes. Thirty-five curations were classified as high evidence (16 Definitive, 10 Strong, 9 Moderate), increasing by 16 from the prior assessment. Nine newly assessed genes were classified as high evidence: BAG5, FLII, LMOD2, MYLK3, MYZAP, NRAP, PPA2, PPP1R13L, and RPL3L. Twelve genes (11 newly appraised) were rated as high evidence with an autosomal recessive (AR) MOI. Five reevaluated genes from 2019-2020 had clinically significant changes in classification. Except for JPH2, for which curation was modified to separate autosomal dominant and AR MOI curations, clinically significant changes involved upgrades from low- to high-evidence categories (PLEKHM2, PRDM16, TBX20, TNNI3K), demonstrating the robustness of the Clinical Genome Resource gene curation process over time. An additional 29 gene-disease-MOI curations were classified as Limited, including 6 newly evaluated genes and 1 new MOI for a previously evaluated gene, MYBPC3-AR; 4 were classified as No Known Disease Relationship, and remained Disputed. Four previously evaluated genes were curated for both AD and AR MOIs: JPH2 (AD-Strong, AR-Limited), LDB3 (AD-Limited, AR-Strong), MYBPC3 (AD-Limited, AR-Limited), and TNNI3 (AD- and AR- Strong).
CONCLUSIONS: With substantial new evidence, the genetic architecture of DCM has rapidly expanded. This updated assessment of genes reported in DCM yielded 35 high-evidence curations, an increase from 19 only 5 years ago. The results of this evidence-based evaluation process inform clinical interpretation of genetic information in the care of DCM patients and families.