Robert Greif, Adam Cheng, Cristian Abelairas‐Gómez, Katherine S. Allan, Jan Breckwoldt, Andrea Cortegiani, Aaron Donoghue, Kathryn Eastwood, Barbara Farquharson, Ming‐Ju Hsieh, Tracy Kidd, Ying‐Chih Ko, Kasper Glerup Lauridsen, Yiqun Lin, Andrew Lockey, Tasuku Matsuyama, Sabine Nabecker, Kevin Nation, Alexander Olaussen, Sebastian Schnaubelt, Taylor Sawyer, Chih‐Wei Yang, Joyce Yeung, Alanowd Alghaith, Theresa Aves, Adam Boulton, Natalie Anderson, Emma Buergstein, Aida Carballo‐Fazanes, Jonathan P. Duff, Bianca Flaim, Heike Geduld, Mariachiara Ippolito, Teruko Kishibe, Tse-Ying Lee, Julian Lennertz, Brenna Leslie, Kaiwei Lin, Henry Cheng-Heng Liu, Matthew Olejarz, Timo de Raad, Andrea Scapigliati, Federico Semeraro, Charlotte Southern, Devita T. Stallings, Lorrel Toft, Sandra Viggers
The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation conducts continuous reviews of new, peer-reviewed, published cardiopulmonary resuscitation science and publishes more comprehensive reviews every 5 years. The Education, Implementation, and Teams chapter of the 2025 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Consensus on Science With Treatment Recommendations describes all published resuscitation evidence reviewed by the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation’s Education, Implementation, and Teams Task Force science experts since 2020. This summary addresses the evidence in 4 subchapters: (1) training populations, (2) faculty development, (3) knowledge translation and implementation, and (4) instructional design. Members from the Education, Implementation, and Teams Task Force have assessed, discussed, and debated the quality of the evidence, based on Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria, and their statements include consensus treatment recommendations. Insights into the deliberations of the task force are provided in the Justification and Evidence-to-Decision Framework Highlights sections. Priority knowledge gaps for further research are listed.