科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Journal of neurointerventional surgery2026-09-18

Balloon guide catheter outcomes by occlusion site in the randomized PROTECT-MT trial.

Huanghuang Chen, Tingyu Yi, Pengfei Xing, Ding-Lai Lin, Xiao-Hui Lin, Zhiting Chen, Yu Zhou, Yan-Min Wu, Zhi-Nan Pan, Lisan Zeng, Shouchun Wang, Tong Li, Weifeng Huang, Yi-Ning Yang, Jin-Hua Ye, Ziyuan Cai, Jianmin Liu, Pengfei Yang, Wen-Huo Chen, PROTECT-MT Investigators

一句话结论 · In one sentence

This exploratory analysis did not provide conclusive evidence that the occlusion site modified the effect of BGC use on 90-day outcome. Imprecise estimates, particularly for M2, preclude site-specific guide catheter selection.

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
BACKGROUND: Balloon guide catheters (BGCs) are used during endovascular thrombectomy, but whether their effect varies by occlusion site is uncertain. We evaluated effect modification by baseline occlusion site in the PROTECT-MT trial. METHODS: This exploratory secondary analysis of the randomized PROTECT-MT trial included patients with core laboratory-adjudicated anterior circulation occlusion site data. Patients were classified as having intracranial internal carotid artery (ICA), M1, or M2 occlusion. The primary outcome was the 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) distribution. Treatment effect modification was assessed using adjusted ordinal logistic regression with a treatment-by-occlusion site interaction term. The parent plan prespecified internal carotid artery (ICA) versus middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusions; the three-level comparison and post hoc Holm correction of 19 secondary interactions were exploratory. RESULTS: Among 329 patients, 88 (26.7%) had ICA occlusions, 206 (62.6%) M1 occlusions, and 35 (10.6%) M2 occlusions. The interaction for the 90-day mRS distribution was not statistically significant (P=0.072). Adjusted common ORs with BGC versus control were 0.38 (95% CI 0.17 to 0.85) for ICA occlusions, 0.60 (95% CI 0.36 to 0.99) for M1 occlusions, and 4.32 (95% CI 0.53 to 35.02) for M2 occlusions. No consistent interaction was observed for first-pass or final reperfusion. Secondary interaction analyses remained exploratory after post hoc multiplicity correction. CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory analysis did not provide conclusive evidence that the occlusion site modified the effect of BGC use on 90-day outcome. Imprecise estimates, particularly for M2, preclude site-specific guide catheter selection. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05592054.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Balloon guide catheter outcomes by occlusion site in the randomized PROTECT-MT trial. — 科研速览 Science Skim