科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Journal of cataract and refractive surgery2026-09-04

Safety and Performance of a New Cohesive Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Device - a Multicenter, Partially Comparative Randomized Study.

Carmen Vogt, Maria Xeroudaki, Alexander Fridberg, Björn Johansson

一句话结论 · In one sentence

This study demonstrates the safety of Minivisc® Plus in terms of IOP spikes, postoperative ocular inflammation, ECD loss, with clinical performance comparable to that of Healon GV® PRO.

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
PURPOSE: To confirm the clinical safety and overall performance of Minivisc® Plus, a cohesive ophthalmic viscosurgical device (OVD). SETTING: Multicenter study conducted at 6 sites in Sweden and Belgium. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, partially comparative, multicenter post market study. METHODS: Subjects requiring anterior segment ophthalmic surgery were eligible for inclusion. The study consisted of two phases. In Phase A (90-day follow-up), a randomized comparison was conducted between Minivisc® Plus and Healon GV® Pro. In Phase B, eyes were treated with Minivisc® Plus and followed for 30 days. Primary endpoint was incidence of intraocular pressure (IOP) ≥30 mmHg at 7 days following operation. Secondary endpoints included postoperative inflammation, corneal endothelial cell density (ECD), surgeon-reported device performance, and the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and device deficiencies (DDs). RESULTS: In total, 163 eyes were included in the study: 54 eyes in Phase A (25 eyes treated with Minivisc® Plus and 29 eyes treated with Healon GV® Pro) and 109 eyes in Phase B. All surgical procedures were phacoemulsification cataract surgeries, apart from two cases (both in Phase B), which were glaucoma surgeries. Two eyes (1.5%) treated with Minivisc® Plus exhibited intraocular pressure (IOP) ≥30 mmHg at postoperative day 7. Inflammation grading, ECD loss, and the incidence of AEs were comparable between the study substances throughout the 90-day follow-up period. Surgeon-reported assessments indicated comparable device performance between the two OVDs. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the safety of Minivisc® Plus in terms of IOP spikes, postoperative ocular inflammation, ECD loss, with clinical performance comparable to that of Healon GV® PRO.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Safety and Performance of a New Cohesive Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Device - a Multicenter, Partially Comparative Randomized Study. — 科研速览 Science Skim