科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Physics in medicine and biology2026-09-21

Variability and bias in the calculation of iodine uptake with an adaptive background subtraction method in contrast-enhanced mammography.

Jorge Patricio Castillo-Lopez, Liliana Moreno Astudillo, Yolanda Villaseñor Navarro, Maria-Ester Brandan

一句话结论 · In one sentence

These findings indicate that iodine uptake quantification in CEM using an adaptive background subtraction method is technically robust, which is a key element for exploring its potential usefulness as an imaging biomarker.

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
OBJECTIVE: This work evaluates variability and bias in the calculation of iodine uptake from contrast-enhanced dual-energy mammography (CEM) images using an adaptive background subtraction method. APPROACH: The iodine uptake images were custom-generated using weighted subtraction, followed by subtraction of a smooth background estimated by interpolation from neighboring regions outside the lesion (adaptive background subtraction). Three main sources of variability and bias were assessed: differences in breast tissue linear attenuation coefficients, stability of the mammography system, and intra- and inter-observer variability in lesion segmentation. Tissue-related effects were evaluated theoretically. System stability was assessed using weekly phantom measurements acquired over a 4-year period. For observer variability, four radiologists performed two segmentation rounds of iodine-enhancing regions in 40 CEM studies. Typical uptake values were below 5 mg/cm2. Whenever possible, variability was expressed as the 95% coverage interval (2σ), where σ represents the standard deviation. MAIN RESULTS: Theoretical evaluation showed that tissue composition differences may introduce biases in iodine uptake exceeding 0.5 mg/cm², although typical lesion compositions produce biases below the visual detection threshold. Long-term phantom measurements demonstrated excellent system stability over four years (2σ ≈ 0.2 mg/cm², and limit of detection = 0.24 mg/cm²), with a 7% change in calibration following a workstation upgrade. In the clinical dataset, the four radiologists achieved high detection agreement when segmenting the primary lesions and greater variability for secondary lesions; the inter-observer variability in mean uptake was approximately 2σ ≈ 0.6 mg/cm². SIGNIFICANCE: These findings indicate that iodine uptake quantification in CEM using an adaptive background subtraction method is technically robust, which is a key element for exploring its potential usefulness as an imaging biomarker.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Variability and bias in the calculation of iodine uptake with an adaptive background subtraction method in contrast-enhanced mammography. — 科研速览 Science Skim