科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ CoDesign2026-03-30· Pragmatism

Pragmatism versus urgency: how participatory design negotiates climate concerns in school energy projects

Goeun Kuu-Park, Sampsa Hyysalo

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
Participatory design (PD) is often applied to engage with big issues, such as climate change mitigation. However, there is an equal concern that PD projects tend to gravitate towards small, immediate, and technologically solvable outcomes. Drawing on a sociomaterial entanglement lens, we analyse six school-based PD projects involving hands-on renewable energy technology engagement to understand how this gravitation towards practical doability can marginalise big issues in PD and how it may result not only from human intentions but also from sociomaterial entanglements. We observe that big issues are not an external aim but rather constituents that are inseparably entangled with school structures, pedagogical norms, ethical conventions, and specific tools. These sociomaterial entanglements configure how participation takes form and, in turn, how energy and climate issues are framed and reframed within PD. Furthermore, aligning with emerging discussions on the asymmetrical nature of sociomaterial entanglement, this perspective sensitises us to see how the co-design process, while entangling with certain elements, can also unintentionally disentangle and marginalise others, including climate concerns. Therefore, we argue that PD for complex social and environmental issues must move beyond human-centric methods and directly interrogate and disrupt the disentanglements that may occur within the sociomaterial assemblage.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Pragmatism versus urgency: how participatory design negotiates climate concerns in school energy projects — 科研速览 Science Skim