科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ The Journal of Physical Chemistry C2026-02-26· Cobalt

Comparison of Industrially Relevant Fischer–Tropsch Cobalt Catalysts Supported on Alumina and Modified Silica with Complementary <i>In-Situ</i> and <i>Operando</i> Characterization Methods

Anna Zimina, Mohamed I. Fadlalla, Jana Potgieter, Catalina Jiménez, Rabia Ilica, Enrico Sireci, Dmitry I. Sharapa, Dominic de Oliveira, Cherie Hsu, Erisa Saraçi, Moritz Wolf, Pinar Sakoglu, Athanasios Skaltsogiannis, Tianli Zhong, Marcus Bär, Thys Botha, D.J. Moodley, Michael Claeys, Felix Studt, Jan-Dierk Grunwaldt

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Power-to-liquid processes are considered a crucial route to substitute petroleum-based processes for the production of valuable chemicals and liquid fuels, opening the possibility for the production of sustainable aviation fuels. Two selected catalysts, 20wt.%Co/Al 2 O 3 (CA) and 20wt.%Co/TiO 2 –SiO 2 (CTS), were tested in the Fischer–Tropsch synthesis (FTS) reaction under industrially relevant conditions. The CTS catalyst showed 10% higher activity, improved C 5+ selectivity, and lower methane formation than the CA catalyst. The components of these complex catalysts were characterized, and the structural evolution of cobalt during activation and reaction was monitored by various in-situ and operando methods. H 2 temperature-programmed reduction, X-ray diffraction, magnetometry, and X-ray absorption spectroscopy revealed a decrease in the temperature of stepwise cobalt reduction in CTS catalysts compared to CA. The reduction behavior of Co during activation was dependent on the support nature and strength of the metal–support interaction. The formation of composites with the support was proposed based on the results obtained by bulk probing XAS and more surface-sensitive NEXAFS methods. XRD, magnetometry, and XAS revealed that the size of the activated Co particles was dependent on the support chosen. The DFT modeling results confirmed the higher affinity of cobalt for titania, which might explain the smaller Co crystallite size and higher stability observed for the CTS catalyst. The difference in activity between the two commercially relevant cobalt-based catalysts on different supports could be linked to the difference in pore sizes and the strength of the metal–support interaction.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Comparison of Industrially Relevant Fischer–Tropsch Cobalt Catalysts Supported on Alumina and Modified Silica with Complementary <i>In-Situ</i> and <i>Operando</i> Characterization Methods — 科研速览 Science Skim