Gregg D. Caruso
This chapter explores the relationship between free will and creativity, asking whether genuine creativity – and the praise and blame that often accompany artistic achievement – requires belief in free will. While philosophical discussions of free will have traditionally focused on moral responsibility, the author argues that creativity is another domain where questions of agency, authorship, and desert arise. Drawing on insights from philosophers such as Paul Russell and Robert Kane, the chapter examines the idea that artistic creation involves a unique form of self-expression, one that is often seen as a reflection of the agent’s freedom and self-authorship. Some thinkers argue that creativity demands the ability to be the ultimate originator of one’s work. The author challenges this view, showing that talent development, creative output, and artistic success are all deeply shaped by factors beyond our control – such as genetic endowments, social circumstances, and access to resources. While creative acts can still be meaningful and admirable, the chapter argues that they do not justify basic desert. Instead, creativity is better understood as a flourishing of human potential rather than a ground for moral praise. Free will skepticism, far from diminishing creativity, encourages humility, gratitude, and a more realistic appreciation of the social and biological scaffolding that makes creative achievement possible.