科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Urology2026-08-17

Post-operative Urinary Tract Infection After Pediatric Pyeloplasty: A Multicenter Analysis of Drain Type, Surgical Approach, and Prophylactic Antibiotics.

Binyamin B Neeman, Boris Chertin, Peter Rubin, Camila Nigri, Moayad Beibooh, Ilan Kafka, Dolev Peretz, Jaudat Jaber, Galia Raisin, Stanislav Kocherov, Leon Chertin

一句话结论 · In one sentence

Drainage configuration, not antibiotic prophylaxis, is the principal determinant of infection risk after pediatric pyeloplasty. Routine post-discharge prophylaxis confers no measurable benefit and may reasonably be withheld in patients managed with an internal stent, supporting a risk-stratified approach guided by drain selection.

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether antibiotic prophylaxis at discharge reduces post-operative urinary tract infection (UTI) after pediatric pyeloplasty, and to identify independent predictors of infection. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 435 consecutive patients who underwent pyeloplasty at two pediatric urology centers. Post-operative UTI was defined as a culture-proven infection accompanied by fever or urinary symptoms; asymptomatic bacteriuria was excluded. Univariate comparisons used chi-square, Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney U tests. A multivariable logistic regression model with Wald-based confidence intervals identified independent predictors; collinearity was assessed by variance inflation factors and confirmed by sensitivity, interaction and surgical-era analyses. RESULTS: UTI occurred in 80 patients (18.4%). Drain type was the strongest predictor (p=0.003): 14.8% with double-J stent (DJS) alone, 26.6% with Pippi Salle external stent and 35.1% with combined DJS+PCN. Both externalized configurations remained independent risk factors after adjustment (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.18-2.68, p=0.006; OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.21-2.21, p=0.001). Pelvic reduction was independently protective (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.30-0.88, p=0.015). Open surgery was significant on univariate analysis (25.5% vs. 15.0%, p=0.011) but not after adjustment (OR 1.34, p=0.302). Prophylaxis, prescribed in 168 patients (38.6%), showed no association with infection (OR 0.96, p=0.781) and no benefit within any drainage subgroup. Drain duration was not associated with infection. CONCLUSIONS: Drainage configuration, not antibiotic prophylaxis, is the principal determinant of infection risk after pediatric pyeloplasty. Routine post-discharge prophylaxis confers no measurable benefit and may reasonably be withheld in patients managed with an internal stent, supporting a risk-stratified approach guided by drain selection.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Post-operative Urinary Tract Infection After Pediatric Pyeloplasty: A Multicenter Analysis of Drain Type, Surgical Approach, and Prophylactic Antibiotics. — 科研速览 Science Skim