M. Bekele, Detlef Müller-Mahn
The Ethiopian government has made significant efforts to promote reforestation and landscape restoration for many years. However, rural communities have been reluctant to participate in these state-led initiatives. Instead, farmers prefer to plant trees on their own land, primarily using exotic species. This apparent paradox raises questions about the motivations and consequences of on-farm tree planting. Our study examines tree-planting practices in the area of the Yayo Biosphere Reserve in south-west Ethiopia, comparing state-led reforestation initiatives with farmer-driven activities. Building upon the concept of ‘political forests’, we introduce the complementary micro-perspective of ‘political trees’ to examine how farmers navigate governance structures, assert land claims, and secure livelihoods through tree planting. Our research shows that state-driven reforestation programmes, often presented as ecological restoration, serve broader political objectives, yet frequently overlook local requirements and land use practices. Meanwhile, unregulated on-farm tree planting, driven by economic incentives and land tenure insecurity can lead to unintended socio-ecological consequences, including land-use conflicts, biodiversity loss, and uneven distribution of benefits among different social groups. By highlighting the tensions between top-down reforestation policies and local land use strategies, this study emphasises the importance of governance frameworks that integrate local agency and ecological sustainability in tree planting initiatives.