Sergey N. Krylov, Svetlana M. Krylova, An Thi Hoai Le, Philip E. Johnson, Ryan Hili, Derek J. Wilson, S. Brian Kim, Gwendolyn M. Stovall, Guobao Xu, Boris B. Dzantiev, Maria DeRosa, Paulo R. Bueno, Philippe Dauphin-Ducharme, Julian A. Tanner, William L. Whitehouse, Qiang Zhao, Jun-Jie Zhu, Anine Crous, Elena Ferapontova
ABSTRACT Aptamer-based biosensors (aptasensors) are widely explored for analytical and diagnostic applications because aptamers combine molecular recognition with scalable chemical synthesis. Yet aptasensors have achieved limited translational impact, motivating scrutiny of development practices. Critical reviews emphasize verifying target binding of the aptamer construct by determining its equilibrium dissociation constant ( K d , a standard measure of binding strength) prior to aptasensor development to avoid interface-contingent artifacts. We refer to this pre-development requirement as the K d gate: an auditable, construct-matched determination of K d in homogeneous, non-denaturing solution under sensing-relevant conditions. Here, we assess compliance with the K d gate by analyzing 209 aptasensor publications spanning six targets. Only 20 of 209 papers reported any solution-phase verification assay, and only one passed the K d gate; among the remaining numeric K d reports, the reported values were weakly constrained or format-contingent and therefore not auditable. As a result, reported sensor-performance claims often cannot be interpreted, transferred, or optimized on a fully rational basis. Although practical feasibility varies across constructs and targets, the observed pattern indicates that technical difficulty alone does not explain the persistent omission. We conclude that voluntary recommendations have not, in practice, functioned as an effective gate and that passing the K d gate should become a mandatory reporting requirement, supported by an auditable checklist for editors and reviewers.