科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ The American journal of emergency medicine2026-08-22

Prospective validation of HACOR score for HFNO failure in emergency department patients with acute respiratory failure.

Emir Unal, Erhan Altunbas, Eren Onur Karavin, Mustafa Altun, Emre Kudu, Cigdem Ozpolat, Sinan Karacabey, Haldun Akoglu, Ozge Onur, Arzu Denizbasi

一句话结论 · In one sentence

The 60-min HACOR score discriminates HFNO failure well, with no evidence of miscalibration, in an unselected ED cohort, substantially outperforming the admission score. The >5 threshold remains the reference for ruling out failure; the ≥8 threshold derived here is exploratory and requires prospective validation.

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
BACKGROUND: High-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) failure occurs in 30-42% of emergency department (ED) patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF). The HACOR score was derived in intensive care patients on mask-based noninvasive ventilation; its performance during HFNO in unselected ED patients has not been prospectively validated. METHODS: Adults started on HFNO for ARF with arterial blood gas data at HFNO initiation (T0) and at 60 min (T60) were prospectively enrolled at a single tertiary academic ED. The primary outcome was HFNO failure (intubation or death from any cause within 48 h). We assessed discrimination (AUC, DeLong method), calibration (cross-validated slope) and clinical utility (decision curve analysis); the Youden-optimal T60 threshold was derived, bootstrap-corrected for optimism, and compared with the original cutoff (HACOR >5). RESULTS: Of 332 patients (median age 71 years; 47.0% male), 117 (35.2%) failed HFNO, of whom 115 (98.3%) were intubated. T60 HACOR outperformed T0 (AUC 0.890 [95% CI 0.853-0.927] vs. 0.701 [0.645-0.757]; ΔAUC +0.189; p < 0.001), showed no evidence of miscalibration (slope 0.98; calibration-in-the-large -0.001), and showed positive net benefit at threshold probabilities of 10-60%. HACOR ≥8 at T60 gave sensitivity 86.3% and specificity 76.7% (bootstrap-corrected 85.5% and 76.3%; selected in 75.5% of resamples); HACOR >5 gave sensitivity 94.9%, specificity 42.3% and NPV 93.8%. Subgroup AUCs ranged 0.856-0.912. CONCLUSION: The 60-min HACOR score discriminates HFNO failure well, with no evidence of miscalibration, in an unselected ED cohort, substantially outperforming the admission score. The >5 threshold remains the reference for ruling out failure; the ≥8 threshold derived here is exploratory and requires prospective validation.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Prospective validation of HACOR score for HFNO failure in emergency department patients with acute respiratory failure. — 科研速览 Science Skim