科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ JACCP JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY2026-06-12· Automatic summarization

Prescribing Caution: A Critique of <scp>OpenEvidence</scp> to Answer Medication‐Related Questions

Jessica Bergsbaken, Paije Wilson, Susan Vandagriff, Leslie Christensen, Lia Vellardita

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
OpenEvidence is a newer medical large language model (LLM) that is growing in use among health professionals and students for clinical care and research. This paper provides an overview of existing literature on the accuracy of using OpenEvidence to answer clinical questions. Given the limited research exploring OpenEvidence's answers to clinical or medication-related questions from a pharmacist's perspective, this paper presents two illustrative examples that highlight inaccuracies of OpenEvidence's responses and source summarization errors related to pharmacotherapeutic content. The authors also offer suggestions for the responsible use of this tool, acknowledging that its adoption by pharmacists and health care professionals is likely to expand.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Prescribing Caution: A Critique of <scp>OpenEvidence</scp> to Answer Medication‐Related Questions — 科研速览 Science Skim