科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Nature Communications2025-10-13· Credibility

LINS: A general medical Q&A framework for enhancing the quality and credibility of LLM-generated responses

Sheng Wang, Fangyuan Zhao, Dechao Bu, Yunwei Lu, Ming Gong, Hongjie Liu, Zhaohui Yang, Xiaoxi Zeng, Zhiyuan Yuan, Baoping Wan, Jingbo Sun, Yang Wu, Lianhe Zhao, Xirun Wan, Wei Huang, Tao Wang, Mengtong Xu, Jianjun Luo, Jingjia Liu, Jianjun Zheng, Jianjun Zheng, Kang Zhang, Kang Zhang, Shu Wang, RunSheng Chen, Yi Zhao

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
Large language models can lighten the workload of clinicians and patients, yet their responses often include fabricated evidence, outdated knowledge, and insufficient medical specificity. We introduce a general retrieval-augmented question-answering framework that continuously gathers up-to-date, high-quality medical knowledge and generates evidence-traceable responses. Here we show that this approach significantly improves the evidence validity, medical expertise, and timeliness of large language model outputs, thereby enhancing their overall quality and credibility. Evaluation against 15,530 objective questions, together with two physician-curated clinical test sets covering evidence-based medical practice and medical order explanation, confirms the improvements. In blinded trials, resident physicians indicate meaningful assistance in 87.00% of evidence-based medical scenarios, and lay users find it helpful in 90.09% of medical order explanations. These findings demonstrate a practical route to trustworthy, general-purpose language assistants for clinical applications.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

LINS: A general medical Q&A framework for enhancing the quality and credibility of LLM-generated responses — 科研速览 Science Skim