科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Journal of veterinary internal medicine2026-09-01

Evaluation of a canine hemoglobin A1c point-of-care assay: analytical validation, clinical utility, and establishing a population-based reference interval.

Denzel Adam, Nicholas Noto, Michael F Rosser, Sarah Connolly, Arnon Gal

一句话结论 · In one sentence

Average intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were 3.92% and 8.47%. Linearity over the clinical range (0.86%-6.27% HbA1c%) was strong (R2 = 0.973) with minor constant bias. HbA1c remained stable for 5 days at 4 °C and up to 3 months at both -20 and -80 °C, but not reliably at 6 months. Lipemia and icterus exhibited variable interfering effects. Method comparison indicated non-interchangeability with the comparator assay. Diabetic dogs had significantly higher HbA1c than NDM (mean 5.10% vs 1.58%). ROC analysis yielded an AUC of 0.969, with a cutoff > 3.22% achieving 90.20% sensitivity and 100% specificity. The positive likelihood ratio was not estimable, and the odds ratio was 22.90 (95% CI, 3.60-146.90). Healthy young dogs' reference interval was 1.25% (90% CI, 1.19-1.59) to 2.75% (90% CI, 2.56-2.90).

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
BACKGROUND: Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) assay validation is essential for establishing analytical reliability, evaluating discrimination between diabetic and non-diabetic (NDM) dogs, and establishing reference intervals. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: Validate a canine HbA1c point-of-care analyzer (Vet Chroma™), evaluate its diagnostic performance, and establish a reference interval in healthy dogs. ANIMALS: Fifty-one diabetic, 44 NDM controls, and 42 healthy client-owned dogs. METHODS: Prospective validation of precision, linearity, interference, and storage stability. Method comparison used an immunoturbidimetric comparator assay (Olympus DxC 700 AU). Diagnostic performance was evaluated via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, likelihood ratios, and odds ratios. RESULTS: Average intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were 3.92% and 8.47%. Linearity over the clinical range (0.86%-6.27% HbA1c%) was strong (R2 = 0.973) with minor constant bias. HbA1c remained stable for 5 days at 4 °C and up to 3 months at both -20 and -80 °C, but not reliably at 6 months. Lipemia and icterus exhibited variable interfering effects. Method comparison indicated non-interchangeability with the comparator assay. Diabetic dogs had significantly higher HbA1c than NDM (mean 5.10% vs 1.58%). ROC analysis yielded an AUC of 0.969, with a cutoff > 3.22% achieving 90.20% sensitivity and 100% specificity. The positive likelihood ratio was not estimable, and the odds ratio was 22.90 (95% CI, 3.60-146.90). Healthy young dogs' reference interval was 1.25% (90% CI, 1.19-1.59) to 2.75% (90% CI, 2.56-2.90). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: The Vet Chroma™ provides reliable HbA1c measurements in canine whole blood and effectively discriminates diabetic from non-diabetic dogs. Results should be interpreted alongside clinical and clinicopathologic findings.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Evaluation of a canine hemoglobin A1c point-of-care assay: analytical validation, clinical utility, and establishing a population-based reference interval. — 科研速览 Science Skim