科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Journal of Global Health2025-12-19· Medicine

Facility newborn and stillbirth data use and enabling factors at different levels of the health system: findings of the IMPULSE study across 142 sites in the Central African Republic, Ethiopia, Tanzania, and Uganda

Firehiwot Abathun, Paolo Dalena, Rornald Muhumuza Kananura, Jacqueline Minja, Ousman Mouhamadou, Mary Ayele, Louise T. Day, Francesca Tognon, Lorenzo Giovanni Cora, Ilaria Mariani, Sara Geremia, Giovanni Putoto, Joy E Lawn, Tamirat Awel, Felix Bundala, Donat Shamba, Peter Waiswa, Marzia Lazzerini

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
Background: Improving data quality and use is a priority identified by the World Health Organization (WHO) to reduce stillbirths and newborn deaths; however, few studies have documented newborn and stillbirth data use in the African Region. To address this gap, we conducted a cross-sectional study from November 2022 to July 2024 in 12 regions and four city administrations across the Central African Republic (CAR), Ethiopia, Tanzania, and Uganda. Methods: We collected data using Every Newborn - Measurement Improvement for Newborn & Stillbirth Indicators (EN-MINI) tools, through direct observation, and from routine electronic and/or paper-based forms and reports. We analysed both the overall and country-level samples following the Performance of Routine Information System Management User's Kit. Results: We assessed 142 sites, comprising 93 health facilities and 49 data offices. Enabling factors, such as electronic systems, guidelines, annual plans, and feedback mechanisms, were highly available in Ethiopia (n/N = 22/30), moderately available in Uganda and Tanzania (n/N = 15/30 and n/N = 12/30), and scarce in the CAR (n/N = 1/30), with key indicators in all countries being ≥80%. Key data-use indicators showed similar patterns across countries, but lower frequencies (Ethiopia: n/N = 15/66; Uganda: n/N = 14/66; Tanzania: n/N = 5/66; the CAR: n/N = 1/66). Decisions documented in meetings rarely focussed on healthcare quality improvement, particularly at the district level (47.1% in Tanzania vs. 44.4% in Uganda vs. 30% in Ethiopia vs. 0% in the CAR). Data dissemination to public representatives was also subpar (40.8% in facilities, 71.4% in subnational offices). Among 141 end-users, 100% of respondents in the CAR, 75-82.4% in Tanzania and Uganda expressed the need to improve the newborn and stillbirth data use compared to 16.7-21.7% in Ethiopia. Conclusions: Newborn and stillbirth data use was low, despite variations across countries and health system levels. Evidence-based decision-making in health service delivery remains a priority action to reduce stillbirths and newborn deaths. This study identified context-specific, sustainable, and scalable interventions co-created with end-users to ensure wider newborn and stillbirth data use.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Facility newborn and stillbirth data use and enabling factors at different levels of the health system: findings of the IMPULSE study across 142 sites in the Central African Republic, Ethiopia, Tanzania, and Uganda — 科研速览 Science Skim