A. Khan, A. Shapiro, N. S. Yazdani, S. G. Abraham, V. Akelo, K. P. Asante, F. Aweyo, A. G. Cherian, M. Jat, F. Jehan, I. K, K. Kasadhe, M. Kasaro, A. C. Lee, A. Mazhar, S. Mazumder, C. Mores, W. Mutale, H. Mwape, S. Newton, M. I. Nisar, L. Ogala, N. Ogola, N. Sharma, M. B. Spelke, J. Sugirtha, Y. Wei, W.-C. Yang, Z. Hoodbhoy, Q. Pan, E. R. Smith
BACKGROUND: Adverse consequences of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia disproportionately affect babies in low- and middle-income countries. Laboratory measurement of total serum bilirubin is limited in low-resource settings, necessitating simpler alternatives. Our study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of visual inspection of jaundice via the World Health Organization Integrated Management of Childhood Illnesses algorithm compared to transcutaneous bilirubinometry for the identification of hyperbilirubinemia in community settings. METHODS: Hyperbilirubinemia was assessed by visual inspection for jaundice and transcutaneous bilirubinometry at 0-72 hours, 3-5 days, and 5-14 days postnatal in the PRISMA prospective cohort study in six sites in Asia and Africa. We assessed sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative percent agreement. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 14,331 infants, including 1,852 preterm infants. 15% had hyperbilirubinemia, as defined by transcutaneous bilirubin values and the NICE nomograms, at 3-5 days postnatal. Visual inspection had a sensitivity of 16%, specificity of 96%, positive percent agreement of 56%, and negative percent agreement of 86% at 3-5 days postnatal age, pooled across all sites and gestational ages, versus transcutaneous bilirubin defined by NICE nomograms. CONCLUSION: The poor sensitivity of visual inspection underscores an urgent need for accurate, affordable screening tools to improve screening for hyperbilirubinemia.