Z. Li, G. Buzzanca, D. v. d. Helm, S. Meziyerh, I. P. J. Alwayn, D. K. d. Vries, H. J. Baelde, A. P. J. d. Vries, J. Kers
Background Pre-implantation biopsy utility for deceased-donor kidney acceptance is controversial due to processing limitations and interpretive variability. We evaluated whether systematic histological assessment, including expert evaluation and quantification with the BanffNET automated deep learning system (17 lesions), predicts post-transplant failure under optimal laboratory conditions. Methods Biopsies from deceased donor kidneys (N=733) underwent optimized laboratory processing, whole slide imaging, expert Banff 2024 pathologic assessment, and BanffNET lesion quantification. We assessed their incremental predictive value beyond clinical characteristics for early graft dysfunction, longitudinal eGFR/UPCR trajectories, need for indication biopsies, and death-censored graft failure. Results Histopathology improved clinical model discrimination by 1-4% and increased explained variance for longitudinal trajectories by 1-2%. Continuous bivariate surface analysis, however, revealed that while histology adds marginal overall predictive accuracy, mapping continuous composite and individual BanffNET scores against the Kidney Donor Risk Index (KDRI) uncovers distinct topological risk gradients for early graft dysfunction and long-term graft failure. Conclusion While pre-implantation biopsies add minimal overall prognostic value, continuous bivariate mapping of KDRI and BanffNET scores uncovers distinct synergistic risk gradients for graft failure. These continuous clinical-histological surfaces could optimize organ salvage by precisely identifying viable high-KDRI kidneys lacking critical compounded damage and vice versa.