科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◇ bioRxiv2026-08-06· microbiology

Challenges of Dry Sanitization to Control Salmonella Dry Surface Biofilms

V. Vaz, J. Finger, R. F. Pereira, E. Santiago Silva, R. Pimentel Maia, J.-Y. Maillard, M. Nascimento

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
Salmonella is a pathogen linked to foodborne outbreaks, including low-moisture foods. Its ability to resist desiccation can contribute to the formation of dry surface biofilms (DSB). This study evaluated the impact of 3 DSB formation protocols (P1=48-h hydrated phase/48-h dry phase, P2=24-h/120-h and P3=8-h/48-h) on the resistance of Salmonella DSB to 70% alcohol, a commercial product (based on 0.015% quaternary ammonium and 25% isopropyl alcohol), gaseous ozone (45 ppm), hot air (90 {degrees}C) and UV-C light (254 nm). The type of DSB protocol impacted the efficacy of the sanitizers (p < 0.05). The biofilm with the shortest hydration phase showed the greatest susceptibility; three out of the five sanitizers evaluated (70% alcohol, commercial product, and UV-C) promoted significant reductions in P3, with counts below the detection limit (0.8 log CFU/cm^2) after 5 to 15 min exposure. Regarding protocols P1 and P2, in general, the best performance was from UV-C, especially against DSB on polypropylene, where it achieved reductions of 1.3 log CFU/cm^2 for P1 and 2.9 log CFU/cm^2 for P2 after 15 to 30 min of exposure. In contrast, hot air and ozone showed less effectiveness, with reductions [&le;]1.2 log CFU/cm^2. In most scenarios, confocal microscopy images corroborated the plate count results (log CFU/cm^2). In summary, our data indicates limited action of dry sanitizers on Salmonella DSB, requiring validation and optimization of sanitization processes to ensure the microbiological safety of low-moisture products.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Challenges of Dry Sanitization to Control Salmonella Dry Surface Biofilms — 科研速览 Science Skim