Magdalena Podkowik, Ananyaa R Welling, Somrita Dey, Alice Tillman, Gregory Putzel, Courtney Takats, Julian McWilliams, Stacey Bartlett, Nora Samhadaneh, Robert J Ulrich, Kristine Rabii, Olufolakemi Olusanya, Caitlin Otto, Karl Drlica, Mila B Ortigoza, Audrey Renson, Alejandro Pironti, Sarah Hochman, Bo Shopsin
Hospital transmission of mupirocin-resistant MRSA is promoted by plasmids that create an evolutionary trap in which mupirocin use selects for bacterial dependence on costly resistance elements. These findings suggest that reducing mupirocin use alone is unlikely to eliminate resistance, underscore the need for genomic surveillance and resistance testing, and provide a framework for strategies to preserve mupirocin effectiveness.
BACKGROUND: Resistance to mupirocin, a cornerstone of Staphylococcus aureus decolonization, is a recognized cause of decolonization failure. Its role in hospital transmission is unknown.
METHODS: We conducted genomic surveillance of >10,000 S. aureus isolates from adult patients at two urban hospitals where mupirocin decolonization is routine. Bacterial phenotypes and fitness were evaluated in vitro and in murine colonization models to interpret surveillance results.
RESULTS: Genome sequencing identified 475 hospital transmission events; conventional surveillance detected none. The plasmid-mediated resistance determinant mupA ( ileS2 ) was enriched eightfold in methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) relative to methicillin-susceptible strains. mupA was associated with nearly threefold greater hospital transmission, especially within healthcare-associated MRSA lineages. Surprisingly, multiple independently evolved inactivating mutations in the essential chromosomal gene ileS1 co-occurred with mupA , creating plasmid addiction in which mupA became indispensable for bacterial survival. Plasmid carriage activated the stringent response and reduced colonization fitness, but also conferred collateral tolerance to disinfectants such as ethanol and peroxide. Although addiction further reduced S. aureus fitness, it increased plasmid transfer, promoting spread despite these costs. Unexpectedly, we found a mupirocin-dependent vulnerability to isoleucine limitation, revealing a potential strategy to target mupA -mediated resistance.
CONCLUSIONS: Hospital transmission of mupirocin-resistant MRSA is promoted by plasmids that create an evolutionary trap in which mupirocin use selects for bacterial dependence on costly resistance elements. These findings suggest that reducing mupirocin use alone is unlikely to eliminate resistance, underscore the need for genomic surveillance and resistance testing, and provide a framework for strategies to preserve mupirocin effectiveness.
MAJOR POINT: This work shows that mupirocin resistance promotes hospital transmission of MRSA, identifies a previously unappreciated mechanism of plasmid addiction, and exposes a collateral vulnerability. These findings underscore the need for genomic surveillance and provide a framework to preserve mupirocin effectiveness.