Юлія Перегуда
The article examines digital financial assets as an instrument of investment portfolio diversification in the Ukrainian investment context. The study argues that Bitcoin and Ethereum should not be assessed through general statements about financial innovation, but through their measurable contribution to portfolio return, volatility and risk-adjusted performance. The empirical part is based on an annual scenario model for 2020–2025 and compares portfolios with 0%, 1%, 3%, 5% and 10% exposure to BTC and ETH. The benchmark portfolio includes domestic government bonds, the USD/UAH currency component, gold and the S&P 500 as a global equity benchmark, while the local Ukrainian equity segment is interpreted cautiously because of its limited liquidity. The results show that portfolios with 1–5% exposure to BTC and ETH improved risk-adjusted efficiency compared with the baseline portfolio. The P3 scenario provided the most balanced relationship between return growth and risk growth, while P5 generated a higher average annual return with still acceptable volatility. The P10 scenario produced the highest geometric average annual return but almost tripled volatility compared with the baseline portfolio, making it more suitable for an aggressive investor profile. The article concludes that digital financial assets may have practical value only as a limited high-risk addition to a diversified portfolio, not as a stable hedging instrument or a substitute for traditional instruments.