科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Journal of comparative effectiveness research2026-09-03

US population-level model of clinical impact of lorlatinib treatment on ALK+ metastatic non-small cell lung cancer outcomes.

Adam Kasle, Devin Abrahami, David Veenstra, Robert Morlock, Priya Ramachandran, Lindsay Stansfield, Raymond Mak

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
Aim: Lorlatinib and alectinib are next-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) approved for the treatment of ALK-positive (ALK+) advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after demonstrating superior efficacy over crizotinib (first-generation ALK TKI) in the CROWN and ALEX trials, respectively. This analysis estimated the US population-level clinical impact of first-line (1L) lorlatinib versus alectinib treatment for ALK+ advanced/metastatic NSCLC. Materials & methods: We developed a decision-analytic model comparing lorlatinib versus alectinib use in 1L. We used a three-state partitioned survival model (pre-progression, post-progression and death) and tracked incidence of brain metastases (BMs). Lorlatinib-eligible population estimates were derived from published literature and market forecasts; treatment effectiveness for lorlatinib was derived from CROWN; alectinib comparative effectiveness was informed using a match-adjusted indirect comparison (CROWN vs ALEX). We assumed lorlatinib uptake of 38% in the base case; selected scenarios included different survival extrapolations, assuming 100% lorlatinib uptake and applying risk of BM post-discontinuation. Results: We estimated that 3096 patients in the US would be eligible for lorlatinib. Compared with 1L alectinib use only, our model projected that 1L lorlatinib treatment results in 1620-5170 and 1590-4880 more life-years and quality-adjusted life-years, respectively, over a 20-year time horizon across scenarios. Per-patient incidence of BM ranged from 0.14-0.18 and 0.21-0.40 for lorlatinib and alectinib, respectively, resulting in 68-256 fewer BMs. Separately, for every 5-15 patients treated with 1L lorlatinib instead of 1L alectinib, one BM would be avoided. Conclusion: This analysis projected that 1L lorlatinib treatment in the US could result in more LYs and quality-adjusted life-years and fewer BMs versus 1L alectinib in ALK+ advanced/metastatic NSCLC.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

US population-level model of clinical impact of lorlatinib treatment on ALK+ metastatic non-small cell lung cancer outcomes. — 科研速览 Science Skim