科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Drug design, development and therapy2026-01-01

Piperine: From Green Extraction to Clinical Translation-A Review.

Malfa Salsabilla Syailatussuraya, Mutakin Mutakin, Saliza Asman, Aliya Nur Hasanah

一句话结论 · In one sentence

Current evidence supports further development but not established stand-alone pharmaceutical efficacy. Translation requires standardized materials, scalable production, exposure-guided formulations, longer-term safety and interaction studies, and adequately powered trials with piperine-specific comparators.

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
BACKGROUND: Piperine has diverse pharmacological and bioenhancing activities, but poor aqueous solubility, variable exposure, interaction liability, and discontinuity across production, formulation, and clinical evaluation limit translation. This review integrates these frequently separated stages. METHODS: A structured narrative PubMed search covered English-language studies published from 1 January 2021 to 27 April 2026, supplemented by ClinicalTrials.gov records checked through 13 June 2026, backward citation searching, and selected earlier seminal studies. Evidence was synthesized by experimental level, methodological limitations, and translational relevance. KEY FINDINGS: In one solvent-circulation study, response surface methodology optimization increased the reported piperine yield from 3.87% to 5.20% of dry material, although external batch or production-scale validation was not reported. In rats, a solid piperine self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery system produced 4.92-fold higher relative oral bioavailability than pure piperine dispersion, without human pharmacokinetic validation. Preclinical studies reported anticancer, anti-inflammatory, neuroprotective, anti-infective, and metabolic effects. Head-and-neck cancer-cell IC50 ranges were 102.8-176.0 µM in HEp-2 cells and 121.0-249.9 µM in SCC-25 cells, without exposure-matched in vivo confirmation. Published trials included COVID-19 (n=140), sepsis (n=66), and ischemic stroke (66 randomized; 56 completed); these trials evaluated curcumin-piperine combinations. A 2025 meta-analysis of 18 curcuminoid-piperine trials reported pooled reductions in AST and IL-6 but not ALT, ALP, CRP, or TNF-α. CHALLENGES: Extraction comparisons were limited by differences in botanical material, process conditions, and analytical methods. Other gaps included production-to-formulation continuity, stand-alone human exposure-response data, substrate-dependent interactions, long-term safety, and predominantly small or combination-based clinical studies. CONCLUSION: Current evidence supports further development but not established stand-alone pharmaceutical efficacy. Translation requires standardized materials, scalable production, exposure-guided formulations, longer-term safety and interaction studies, and adequately powered trials with piperine-specific comparators.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Piperine: From Green Extraction to Clinical Translation-A Review. — 科研速览 Science Skim