Thomas Corbin, Margaret Bearman, David Boud, Nicole Crawford, Phillip Dawson, Tim Fawns, Michael Henderson, Jason Lodge, Jiahui (Jess) Luo, Kelly Matthews, Kelli Nicola-Richmond, Juuso Nieminen, Nicole Pepperell, Zachari Swiecki, Joanna Tai, Jack Walton
The emergence of widely available artificial intelligence (AI) tools has made assessment in higher education increasingly uncertain. Familiar (if problematic) assumptions about what assessment does or should measure, who or what is being assessed, and how judgments are made are all being reexamined. Educators and researchers are experimenting with new assessment designs, but the emerging research landscape is fragmented and difficult to navigate. There is little shared sense of what kinds of studies are most needed or how their findings might connect. To address this, a group of leading assessment scholars met in Melbourne, Australia in September of 2025 to develop a collective research agenda to help guide and connect future inquiry. This paper presents the outcomes of that collaboration, a set of guiding principles and framing questions – why, who, what, how, and where we assess – that together offer a structure for guiding and supporting the research we should be doing on assessment after AI.