科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026-01-01

Integrating conformal prediction with machine learning for uncertainty-aware risk stratification in coronary artery disease.

Shengnan Lin, Xuyang Hu, Yang Zhang, Qi Zhang, Xiaoning Wang, Yang Yang, Fuzheng Song, Yutong Li, Yushan Liu, Yuanpeng Zhao, Dingjian Zhao, Minghua Nan, Changchuan Bai

一句话结论 · In one sentence

The integration of CP with machine learning has led to the development of the RF-MSCP model, which provides reliable uncertainty quantification for CAD risk prediction, especially in small sample settings. By identifying potentially high-risk individuals overlooked by traditional models, this approach improves predictive discrimination and supports more robust clinical decision.

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
BACKGROUND: Predictive models are increasingly used in clinical decision-making in coronary artery disease (CAD). However, most existing models focus on discriminative ability while ignoring individual prediction uncertainty, which is particularly prominent in small-sample contexts, limiting clinical applications. METHODS: We developed an uncertainty-aware model integrating machine learning and conformal prediction (CP) for CAD prediction in a small-sample setting cohort (N = 297). Logistic regression (LR) and random forest (RF) models were trained using clinical variables and evaluated for predictive performance. CP was applied to quantify prediction uncertainty and generate prediction sets with statistical coverage guarantees. Model reliability was assessed using coverage and prediction set characteristics. By combining predicted risk probabilities with uncertainty information, the model transforms traditional binary classification into a four-class framework that reflects both the level of risk (high vs. low) and the certainty of the prediction (high vs. low), thereby enabling a more informative risk stratification. RESULTS: Both LR and RF show strong discrimination (AUC 0.953 and 0.951). LR is slightly better calibrated, while RF is more accurate. CP efficiently quantifies uncertainty. Union and intersection achieve higher coverage, whereas MSCP with voting balances coverage and efficiency. The combined RF-MSCP model maintains empirical coverage above the nominal level across all significance thresholds, demonstrating robust uncertainty assessment and risk prediction in small-sample settings. CONCLUSION: The integration of CP with machine learning has led to the development of the RF-MSCP model, which provides reliable uncertainty quantification for CAD risk prediction, especially in small sample settings. By identifying potentially high-risk individuals overlooked by traditional models, this approach improves predictive discrimination and supports more robust clinical decision.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Integrating conformal prediction with machine learning for uncertainty-aware risk stratification in coronary artery disease. — 科研速览 Science Skim