Cecília da Silva, Amanda Campos, Luanna Freitas Johnson
This study proposes a critical analysis of Brazilian academic productions in Psychology on Risk and Disaster Management, aiming to verify the extent to which these works align with the guidelines established by the Technical References for the Practice of Psychologists in Comprehensive Management of Risks, Emergencies, and Disasters (Federal Council of Psychology, 2021), as well as their implications for professional training. Using a qualitative approach, a bibliographic and documentary review was conducted, covering publications between 2018 and 2025. The research corpus includes nine scientific articles and 27 Psychology Course Pedagogical Projects (PPCs) from Brazilian federal universities. The analysis allowed the systematization of the findings into three categories: (1) social knowledge and experiences in the territory; (2) work in disasters and public policies; and (3) limits and challenges for the professional practice of psychologists. The results highlight the persistent invisibility of popular knowledge, the limited inclusion of the topic in academic curricula, and the need for integrated action with public policies. The conclusion is that there is an urgent need to expand the technical and ethical training of psychologists for work in emergency settings, reaffirming Psychology's commitment to human rights, social justice, and the dignity of vulnerable populations. Keywords: Psychology; Disasters; Professional training; Public policies; Technical Reference (CFP).