科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland2026-09-01

Threshold association analysis between residual tumour size and distant metastasis risk after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: A multicentre retrospective study.

Hao Zeng, Xueyi Xue, Dongbo Chen, Xiaojie Wang, Kun Lan, Zhilong Yuan, Wenchang Gan, Baodong Liao, Bozhang Wu, Dongbo Xu, Bing Zeng, Pan Chi, Shuangming Lin, Ying Huang

一句话结论 · In one sentence

This study established an objective prognostic threshold for RTS following nCRT. This marks a shift in the understanding of this indicator-from a static association between 'risk and size' to a dynamic association between 'risk and time'.

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
PURPOSE: This study aimed to perform a threshold analysis of residual tumour size (RTS) to identify the critical threshold influencing distant metastasis (DM), thereby enabling more precise risk stratification. METHODS: This multicentre retrospective cohort study included patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent radical surgery following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted and compared using the log-rank test. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify independent prognostic factors. The threshold-effect analysis was performed to determine the potential critical point of RTS. RESULTS: In this multi-institutional study, threshold-effect analysis identified a significant inflection point at 3 cm for the association between RTS and DM risk. Below this threshold, each 1-cm increase was associated with a markedly higher risk (HR = 1.70, p = 0.015), whereas no significant association was observed above 3 cm (p = 0.692). Patients with an RTS ≥3 cm exhibited significantly poorer early (≤ 24 months) recurrence-free survival (RFS) and disease-free survival (DFS). After 24 months, the pattern was reversed. RTS ≥3 cm was an independent risk factor for both worse RFS (HR = 1.45, p = 0.033) and DM. Subgroup analyses confirmed the consistent negative prognostic impact of RTS ≥3 cm across most strata. CONCLUSIONS: This study established an objective prognostic threshold for RTS following nCRT. This marks a shift in the understanding of this indicator-from a static association between 'risk and size' to a dynamic association between 'risk and time'.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Threshold association analysis between residual tumour size and distant metastasis risk after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: A multicentre retrospective study. — 科研速览 Science Skim