Tal Boger, Chaz Firestone
Any information-processing system must deal with the complexity of its input. Yet, complexity arises in many forms: an image may be complex, a melody may be complex, and so too for linguistic or mathematical expressions. Are these disparate forms of complexity 'unified' in the mind, such that cognition represents a common quantity shared across qualitatively different types of information? Here we present 11 experiments (N = 1,500) that reveal domain-general representation of complexity. First, a reward-transfer task revealed that outcomes associated with complexity generalize across diverse stimulus classes, including shapes, dot arrays, melodies, letter strings, mathematical expressions and tactile forms. Subsequent experiments demonstrated that such transfer occurs automatically (intruding on task-irrelevant judgements) and underwrites individual differences in higher-level judgements across domains; for example, participants who find simple shapes aesthetically pleasing also find simple melodies pleasing. These results implicate a capacity for type-independent representation of information density, consistent with a shared representational language across cognitive domains.