科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Lasers in medical science2026-09-01

Efficacy of FiLaC in different types of anal fistula. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Xingli Xu, Jiong Wu, Jialin Qin, Lei Jin, Zhicheng Li, Peter C Ambe

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
Fistula Tract Laser Closure (FiLaC) represents a minimally invasive technique for the management of fistula in ano. However, no data exists on the success rates of FiLaC for the different fistula types. This systematic analysis and meta-analysis were performed following the PICOS and PRISMA guidelines. A systematic literature review was conducted for articles published in Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed using search terms 'Anal fistula OR fistula in ano OR anorectal fistula' (Mesh term), 'Laser', 'Park´s classification, 'complex fistula (Mesh term), and 'Clinical Trial' (Mesh term), 'healing rate', and 'closure rate' from inception until February 2025. Pooled results for 16 studies indicated higher healing rates for simple fistula (60.8%) compared to complex fistula (54.6%). Amongst complex fistulae, transsphincteric fistulae have the best odds of healing following FiLaC. The success rate of FiLaC for extrasphincteric and suprasphincteric fistulae is about 50%. Amongst all fistula types, although not statistically significant simple fistulae have a higher odds of healing following FiLaC in comparison to complex fistulae. Amongst complex fistulae, transsphincteric fistulae have the best success rates following FiLaC. Extrasphincteric and suprasphincteric fistulae have about 50% success rate following FiLaC.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Efficacy of FiLaC in different types of anal fistula. A systematic review and meta-analysis. — 科研速览 Science Skim