Xinge Quan, Qingqing Jiao, Yao Lu, Mochen Liu, Jing Wang, Yudao Li, Shengxiang Zhu, Fuyang Tian, Zhanhua Song, Yinfa Yan
Mulberry (Morus spp.) leaves, fruits, branches, and root bark are rich in bioactive compounds, including 1-deoxynojirimycin (1-DNJ) and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), supporting their potential use in food, medicinal, and feed applications. Their high moisture content, however, makes fresh materials highly susceptible to postharvest quality deterioration, making drying essential for stabilization and high-value utilization. Drying technologies involve trade-offs among efficiency, energy consumption, sensory quality, rehydration, and bioactive-compound retention. This review provides a comprehensive overview of pretreatment and drying technologies for mulberry materials, with particular attention to differences in raw-material characteristics, processing conditions, analytical methods, and reporting bases that limit direct comparisons among studies. Current evidence suggests that low-temperature, low-oxygen, or short-duration technologies, including vacuum freeze-drying, microwave drying, and microwave-vacuum drying, may better preserve quality in certain thermosensitive products, although their benefits remain product- and process-dependent. Hot-air, solar, infrared, heat-pump, and hybrid drying remain practical options for bulk products but require optimization to balance quality, energy efficiency, and scalability. For juice and functional powders, carrier selection, powder properties, and bioaccessibility require further study. Overall, the available evidence is heterogeneous, and some conclusions rely on limited mulberry-specific data or extrapolation from related plant matrices. Future research should emphasize standardized quality evaluation, harmonized reporting, kinetic modeling, multi-objective optimization, online monitoring, energy and carbon-footprint assessment, and industrial-scale validation.