Lorenzo Albanese
Hydrodynamic cavitation (HC) is increasingly investigated for juice processing, but changes in pectin methylesterase (PME), polyphenol oxidase (PPO), and peroxidase (POD) activity do not by themselves establish a technological benefit. Several mild or temperature-limited conditions left substantial residual activity, whereas stronger control was observed in thermally assisted, more severe, or hurdle-assisted treatments. Physical stability can nevertheless improve despite limited PME or PPO inactivation, consistent with concurrent particle-size reduction, pectin restructuring, rheological modification, and other matrix-level changes. Within-study quantitative comparisons showed that, in all six directly comparable enzyme-level contrasts, inactivation at the selected or experimentally validated condition was lower than the largest directly observed value for the same enzyme. In the three exact same-condition PPO storage trajectories, end-of-storage inactivation was lower than at day 0. Current evidence therefore supports treatment-level responses more strongly than cavitation-specific causality and does not justify a universal HC operating window. Technologically meaningful process development requires matrix-, enzyme-, and reactor-specific conditions that provide sufficient enzyme control for a defined product function, a favorable linked physicochemical response, acceptable quality retention, and persistence during storage, supported by adequate hydraulic and thermal characterization and controls matched to the causal claim.