Intermediate-Term Oncological, Anastomotic and Nutritional Outcomes of the Sutureless L-Shaped Esophagojejunostomy with Endoscopic Assistance (SLEJ) in Totally Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy: A Follow-Up Analysis of This Technique.

Background and Objectives: Intra-corporeal esophagojejunostomy after totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy (TLTG) remains one of the most technically demanding steps of minimally invasive gastric surgery. The management of the common entry hole in linear stapler-based reconstructions still relies on advanced intra-corporeal suturing. The sutureless L-shape esophagojejunostomy with endoscopic assistance (SLEJ) technique, previously described by our group, was developed to overcome this limitation by combining an L-shaped linear stapler configuration with intraoperative endoscopic quality control. Building upon our initial results on the perioperative feasibility of the technique, the present study aimed to evaluate its intermediate-term anastomotic, functional, and oncological outcomes. Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent TLTG with D2 lymph node dissection and SLEJ reconstruction for gastric cancer between July 2024 and January 2026 were evaluated. Eligibility criteria included a minimum postoperative follow-up of six months, clinical and endoscopic surveillance, and complete contrast-enhanced thoraco-abdominopelvic computed tomography records. Protocol-based upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed at six-month intervals irrespective of symptoms to objectively assess anastomotic lumen width, mucosal healing, reflux findings, and possible intraluminal recurrence. The primary endpoint was anastomosis complication-free survival (anastomotic stenosis, alkaline reflux/reflux esophagitis, marginal ulcer, bleeding due to ulceration, and intraluminal recurrence); secondary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS), local recurrence and changes to nutritional status. Results: A total of 26 patients (18 men and 8 women; mean age 59.0 ± 7.8 years) were analyzed. Anastomotic stricture developed in two patients and was successfully managed with two sessions of endoscopic balloon dilation in both. Similarly, alkaline reflux was documented in two additional patients and resolved under medical treatment. None of the patients required surgical revision. The mean ACFS follow-up duration was 12.42 months with ACFS rates of 92.3% at six months and 81.1% from the twelfth month onward. No local anastomotic recurrence was detected during follow-up. Disease progression occurred in four patients (15.4%), presenting as distant organ metastasis (n = 2) or peritoneal carcinomatosis (n = 2). The mean DFS follow-up duration was 12.62 ± 6.18 months, and the twelve-month OS and DFS rates were 82.1% and 84.0%. Postoperative body weight decreased significantly compared with preoperative values (76.69 ± 15.59 kg vs. 63.23 ± 10.55 kg; p < 0.001). A significant decrease was observed in the mean SMI between the preoperative and follow-up assessments (p < 0.001). The mean preoperative SMI was 49.90 ± 9.04 cm2/m2, compared with 44.53 ± 7.98 cm2/m2 at follow-up. No statistically significant changes were observed between the preoperative and follow-up periods for serum albumin and PNI variables (p = 0.703 and p = 0.970). Conclusions: The present intermediate-term analysis suggests that the SLEJ technique is feasible and associated with acceptable intermediate-term anastomotic, functional, and oncological outcomes in this preliminary single-center cohort. By standardizing common entry-hole management without intra-corporeal suturing and incorporating intraoperative endoscopic quality control, the technique offers a feasible alternative to established linear stapler-based reconstructions.