Performance of Oil Spill Identification in Multiple Scenarios Using Quad-, Compact-, and Dual-Polarization Modes

Oil spills, whether in open water or near shorelines, cause serious environmental problems. Moreover, polarimetric synthetic-aperture radar provides abundant oil spill information with all-weather, day–night detection capability, but its use is limited by data usage and processing costs. Compact Polarimetric (CP) systems as a subsequent emerging system, which balance data volume and system design requirements, are promising in this regard. Herein, we utilize multisource oil spill scenarios and datasets from multiple polarimetric modes (VV-HH, π/4, DCP, and CTLR) to assess the oil spill detection capability of each mode under varying incidence angles conditions, spill causes, and oil types. Using qualitative and quantitative evaluation indicators, we compare the typical features of the multiple polarization modes as well as assess their consistency with Full Polarization (FP) information and their oil spill recognition performance across different incidence angles. In large-incidence-angle oil spill scenarios, the VV–HH mode exhibits the highest information consistency with the FP mode and the strongest oil spill recognition ability. At small incidence angles, the CP mode (i.e., CTLR mode) exhibits the best overall performance, benefiting from its effective self-calibration capability and low noise sensitivity. Furthermore, despite containing comprehensive information, the FP mode is not always superior to the dual-polarization and CP modes. Thus, in oil spill scenarios across different incidence angles, incorporating features from an appropriate polarization mode into oil spill information extraction and recognition can optimize the associated efficiency.