科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing2026-04-09· Artificial intelligence

Defect Monitoring of Complex Geometries Through Machine Learning in LPBF Metal Additive Manufacturing

Marcin Magolon, Jan Boer, M.A. Elbestawi

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) can fabricate intricate metal components but is prone to defects, such as porosity and cracks, that degrade performance. We present an in situ monitoring framework that fuses structure-borne acoustic emission (AE) and coaxial two-color pyrometry acquired synchronously at 1 MHz. Modality-specific encoders are pretrained separately, their latent representations are exported, and a lightweight feature-level fusion classifier with two binary heads predicts crack-like and porosity-like indications. Evaluation uses a held-out grouped experiment/build-machine-part split with independent Archimedes density and micro-CT ground truth. On the held-out test set, the fused model achieved F1 = 0.974 for crack-like detection and F1 = 0.987 for porosity-like detection, with AUROC = 0.998 and 0.993, respectively. Recall was 1.00 for both heads, corresponding to false-positive rates of 11.18% for crack-like and 0.945% for porosity-like indications. These results support synchronized AE-pyrometry fusion as a promising high-sensitivity in situ screening approach for LPBF. A later matched within-framework ablation campaign was also performed under stricter checkpoint-screening rules to compare AE + PY + Aux, AE + PY, AE-only, and PY-only variants under a common grouped-split protocol. Together, these results support multimodal monitoring while highlighting the need for explicit coupon/geometry-stratified reporting and for separately architecture-optimized unimodal baselines.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Defect Monitoring of Complex Geometries Through Machine Learning in LPBF Metal Additive Manufacturing — 科研速览 Science Skim