科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Journal of market access & health policy2026-09-21

Role of General Practitioners in European Health Technology Assessment, EU-HTA Innovation in Oncology as an Example.

Daniel Widmer, Hermenegildo Marcos Carrera, Jörg Ruof, Gunasekara Vidanamestrige Chamath Fernando, Patrick Ouvrard, Marie-Christine Bonnamour, Mary McCarthy, Shrikant Atreya

一句话结论 · In one sentence

Most respondents supported GP involvement in the development of clinical recommendations relevant to general practice. Respondents emphasized that UEMO must turn to WONCA-Europe, the academic society of GPs, when scientific input is required. Among the ten priority topics for HTA in oncology, four emerged as most relevant for the GPs: 1. Conscientious prescription of interventions considering over- and under-medicalization, 2. establishing a system for continuity of care integrating palliative care, 3. ensuring evidence-based medicine, and 4. promoting collaborative care and considering workload.

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
INTRODUCTION: Different from established clinical guideline workstreams, the participation of general practitioners (GPs) in the health technology assessment (HTA) process at the European level is new. There is a research gap in this domain. The European Union of General Practitioners (UEMO) is the political association of GPs in Europe and has been collaborating as a stakeholder in the creation of the European Regulation on HTA since 2017. The aim of our research is to provide a framework for GPs'role in EU HTA. METHODS: Mixed methods: questionnaire and focus groups. PARTICIPANTS: Representatives of national medical/GP associations of 17 Member States of the EU and five EU non-member countries. RESULTS: Most respondents supported GP involvement in the development of clinical recommendations relevant to general practice. Respondents emphasized that UEMO must turn to WONCA-Europe, the academic society of GPs, when scientific input is required. Among the ten priority topics for HTA in oncology, four emerged as most relevant for the GPs: 1. Conscientious prescription of interventions considering over- and under-medicalization, 2. establishing a system for continuity of care integrating palliative care, 3. ensuring evidence-based medicine, and 4. promoting collaborative care and considering workload. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The GP can contribute to the debate by defending these four priorities. Presenting the difficulties in this debate can contribute to a better understanding of the implementation of new technology in the real world.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Role of General Practitioners in European Health Technology Assessment, EU-HTA Innovation in Oncology as an Example. — 科研速览 Science Skim