Luca Agnifili, Davide Celani, Maria Ludovica Ruggeri, Alessandro Sferra, Rodolfo Mastropasqua, Francesco Oddone, Carmela Carnevale, Antonio Pinna, Michele Figus, Matteo Sacchi
Both treatments proved valuable in managing GTOSD, supporting the use of lubricants in this condition. GPI/HA showed a broader pattern of improvement, which should be interpreted cautiously given the observational design and limited inter-group differences.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of 0. 001% glycerophosphoinositol in 0.2% hyaluronate (GPI/HA) vehicle eye drops in patients with glaucoma therapy related-ocular surface disease (GTOSD).
METHODS: Forty patients diagnosed with GTOSD and receiving GPI/HA or HA 0.2%, underwent ocular surface disease index (OSDI), Symptom Assessment iN Dry Eye (SANDE), National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ)-25 questionnaires, and tear matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), break-up time (BUT), corneal fluorescein staining (CFS), Schirmer test I (STI), and bulbar conjunctival hyperemia (BCH) determination.
RESULTS: After 1 month, GPI/HA eyedrops increased BUT [6 (4-7.25) to 7 (6-8)] and STI [11.5 (8-17.5) to 13.5 (10-18.5)], whereas decreased BCH [2.2 (2.1-2.3) to 2.1 (1.3-2.2)] and CFS [3 (2-4) to 2 (2-3)] (p < 0.001). Questionnaire scores improved from 35 (24.36-46.25) to 33 (20.75-40.52), for SANDE and from 31.5 (20-45) to 28.5 (17.75-40.5), for OSDI (p < 0.001). HA 0.2% eyedrops reduced BCH from 2.75 (2.15-3.20) to 2.25 (1.90-2.30) and CFS from 3.5 (2.75-5) to 2.5 (2-4) (p = 0.014), and increased BUT (p = 0.036). Questionnaire scores improved from 28.95 (20.9-47.6) to 26.86 (19.90-36.41) (p = 0.009) for SANDE, and from 40 (19.5-49) to 29 (19.75-42) (p = 0.005) for OSDI. There were not significant modifications in the MMP-9 immunoassay positivity in either treatment group. Follow-up inter-group comparisons showed better BCH values in GPI/HA, and better NEI VFQ-25 scores in HA 0.2%.
CONCLUSION: Both treatments proved valuable in managing GTOSD, supporting the use of lubricants in this condition. GPI/HA showed a broader pattern of improvement, which should be interpreted cautiously given the observational design and limited inter-group differences.