Microtia, Hearing Disability, and Health Inequity: Socioeconomic Disparities in Rehabilitation and Specialized Care in Ecuador.

Background: Microtia is a congenital anomaly of the external ear that is frequently associated with conductive or mixed hearing impairment and potential developmental consequences. Although genetic factors may contribute to some cases, social and economic conditions can influence access to diagnosis, hearing rehabilitation, and specialized care. This study examined clinical severity, hearing disability, and socioeconomic characteristics among patients with isolated and familial microtia evaluated in Ecuador. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary referral center in Quito, Ecuador. A total of 143 patients with microtia were included. Clinical variables included hearing impairment, hearing device use, microtia severity, associated risk factors, and family history. Sociodemographic variables included age, sex, residence, economic level, and healthcare access. Categorical variables were summarized as frequencies and percentages, and continuous variables as medians with interquartile ranges. Group comparisons were performed using the chi-square test and the Mann-Whitney test. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with hearing device use. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: Hearing impairment was present in 41.78% of patients, with similar prevalence in isolated and familial cases. Hearing device use was reported by 19.86% of the sample. Familial microtia showed a significantly different distribution of right-ear severity, with higher frequencies of grade 1 and grade 4 anomalies, whereas isolated microtia was more commonly grade 3. Significant differences were also observed in sex distribution and economic level. Isolated cases were more frequent among males, whereas familial cases showed a higher proportion of females. Familial microtia was concentrated mainly in the low-middle economic stratum. In multivariable analysis, no factor was independently associated with hearing device use, and confidence intervals were wide, indicating limited precision. Conclusions: In this tertiary referral sample, microtia-related disability and access to care appeared to reflect the combined influence of clinical vulnerability, familial aggregation, and socioeconomic disadvantage. The low use of hearing devices despite frequent hearing impairment indicates an important gap between clinical need and rehabilitation. Equity-oriented strategies, including early hearing screening, timely referral, financial protection for assistive devices, and improved access to specialized care, may help reduce unmet needs among patients with microtia.