Rajesh Elangovan, Durga Devi Parthasarathy, M. Jawahar, Prabu Kaliyaperumal, Balamurugan Balusamy, Sumendra Yogarayan, Vivek Venkatesan
The increasing heterogeneity of cloud, enterprise, and Internet of Things (IoT) environments raises concerns about the long-term reliability of machine-learning-based intrusion detection systems (IDSs). This study evaluates temporal robustness and cross-domain generalization using four publicly available datasets collected between 2017 and 2024. Five representative models—Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Multi-Layer Perceptron, Autoencoder, and a lightweight 1D-CNN—are assessed under in-dataset, forward temporal, enterprise-to-IoT transfer, and dataset-agnostic evaluation protocols without retraining. In the dataset evaluation, models achieve Macro-F1 scores between 0.84 and 0.96. However, forward temporal testing reveals consistent degradation, with performance reductions reaching ΔF1 ≈ 0.20–0.27 when models trained on 2017 enterprise traffic are applied to IoT datasets from 2023 to 2024. Under cross-domain transfer, Macro-F1 decreases to 0.69–0.78, and benign false-positive rates increase up to 0.30, indicating substantial sensitivity to traffic distribution shifts. Tree-based ensemble models show comparatively lower degradation (≈6–23%) and reduced performance variance across datasets. Semantic feature analysis further indicates that flow intensity and temporal activity features exhibit higher cross-dataset stability than protocol-dependent indicators. These findings demonstrate that IDS robustness in evolving Internet environments depends strongly on evaluation methodology and feature stability, highlighting the need for generalization-oriented assessment strategies.